The future of 67-72 trucks?

General Discussion Topic Archives
User avatar
jzjames
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Washington, Windy Point

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by jzjames »

glad youre all so accepting of the fact that gas is on its way to $3.00/gal.
jz
User avatar
shrektruck
New Member
New Member
Posts: 193
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:22 pm
Location: Virginia, King george
Contact:

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by shrektruck »

I can tell you about the future of a nice '72 crewcab.
The shrektruck's going to get a crower cam, fresh heads, electric fans, Elite headers (Maybe FPA if I win the lottery), a new interior, Mirrors, new grill, paint and trim and the list goes on....
I'll pay for gas when I drive it alot but it's worth it. I am seriously considering a Gear Vendors overdrive unit or I saw a article in some hot rod magazine with two trannys one behind the other for a nine speed.
I figure if gas gets totally outrageous I can set up a still in the back yard ( :twisted: just for fuel honey, I swear :twisted: ).
I'm surely not gonna give her up. When an alternative power source makes sense I'll convert it over. Till then I can suck it up. It's almost worth paying the high prices to see peoples faces when I pull up in the gas line. :eek:
User avatar
jzjames
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1782
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 2:59 pm
Location: Washington, Windy Point

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by jzjames »

--or you could look at it this way.....run to the store for for a soda or a beer, pay $1.25 for the beer and $3.00 for the gas, there and back.
It's that fuzzy math again!!
User avatar
ToughOldFord
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1911
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 10:47 pm
Location: Communist California, USA

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by ToughOldFord »

Only one beer?
User avatar
flyboy2610
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4901
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by flyboy2610 »

Cheapest I've seen it this week is $2.29.
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
Red Green

If you're going to live like there's no hell...............
you'd better be right.
http://theworldasiseeit-flyboy2610.blog ... ee-it.html
User avatar
heep70
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Washington, Bonney Lake
Contact:

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by heep70 »

I got gas for free today.




Chile :evil:
.
.
.
.
.
. :D
Last edited by heep70 on Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:26 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Greg

1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

yea driving off works good as long as they don't see you do it.:lol:
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Post by rjewkes »

no he mean alfartizein(farfugnugen). I too look at it like this. The other day in joplin when i refilled before heading home. This guy in a monster 10-12 mpg Ford Excursion or expedition, Asked me how can you afford that at 10 mpgs. I said i don't owe anybody any money on the truck.

He looked mad after that. I mean whats the point of a monster $550.00 payment if it means i can't go anywhere or live anywhere. Or even eat anything.

My income is at best 850-950 a month rent insurance and gasoline. Plus power bill equals 95%(and sometimes more)of that. And thats before I eat.

And in a months time I need to eat atleast half the time.
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
tynall44
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 269
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 11:47 pm
Location: Kentucky

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by tynall44 »

they can have my old 69 when they pry it from my cold dead hands empty gas tank and all ,ive had mine 30 yrs and id rather drive it than a new one
crazyace99million
New Member
New Member
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 6:49 pm

Re: re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by crazyace99million »

fordfanatic wrote:I'm currently looking for a 4cyl conversion for the 71. Great looks and styling, and 25-30 miles per gallon! What more could you want? Don't try to pull a utility trailer though.

i dont know about you, but my truck weighs 7500 lbs,,,,now a 4 cylinder wouldn't last very long w/ that much weight..
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

7500? what is it a sherman tank? most of the trucks came out stock under 4000 lbs.
TEXAS 70 RANGER XLT
New Member
New Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:03 pm
Location: Texas, Arlington

re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by TEXAS 70 RANGER XLT »

I agree that as long as our kid's are interested in our trucks they will remain in demand and as they grow up they'll be fix'n up that 70 the begged to drive for the first time.

I know my boys are just itching to drive mine and they are just 9 & 7.

My nephew is 24 and everytime I see him he asks what I'd take for the XLT. I tell him ....one day I give him the number.....

That is what will keep these rides on the streets.
If you always do what you've always done. You'll always get what you always got.

Greg
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Post by rjewkes »

Hey gang 2.16 a gallon in Joplin, Mo. Down it goes. I'd be happy if it just got to 2.00 or 1.90 Atleast then it would be 10 gallon for 20.00 and 18.5 for about 30-36.00.
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
User avatar
The Good Humor Man
New Member
New Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: re: The future of 67-72 trucks?

Post by The Good Humor Man »

crazyace99million wrote:
fordfanatic wrote:I'm currently looking for a 4cyl conversion for the 71. Great looks and styling, and 25-30 miles per gallon! What more could you want? Don't try to pull a utility trailer though.

i don't know about you, but my truck weighs 7500 lbs,,,,now a 4 cylinder wouldn't last very long w/ that much weight..
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

I scaled mine, it weighed 6500 pounds EMPTY. And my little 6 cyl keeps up with traffic just fine, but after 60 I will be waving good bye to you in your mirror.
It's all in the gearing!
http://WWW.GoodHumorTrucks.Com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Post Reply